//
-->//]]>

Democrats introduce bill to provide term limits of Supreme Court Justices

 

The bill would let the president appoint a justice in the first and third years of his term an each justice would serve for 18years before retiring from regular active service
Photo Credit: AP.

A group of Democrats Tuesday introduced a bill to provide term limits on Supreme Court justices.

The bill would let the president appoint a justice in the first and third years of his term an each justice would serve for 18years before retiring from regular active service, Washington Times cited a report by Axios.

Why does the Democrats want to limit terms of Supreme Court Justices

The move by the Democrats is unconnected with a recent Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade which provided unprecedented access to abortion. The ruling allowed individual states to ban abortion in their respective states.

Democrats said the current court, consisting of members appointed for life, is illegitimate because of the popular vote that allows them to make landmark rulings or overturn landmark rulings.

“Five of the six conservative justices on the bench were appointed by presidents who lost the popular vote, and they are now racing to impose their out-of-touch agenda on the American people, who do not want it,” Rep. Hank Johnson, Georgia Democrat and co-sponsor of the bill, said in a statement, according to The Associated Press.

Axios reported that Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island Democrat, will introduce the bill in the Senate.

The bill would most likely fail in the Senate since the number of Democrats and Republicans are evenly split at 50-50.

The Washington Times reported that its constitutionality is dubious since one of the few specific provisions of Article III, which established the judicial branch, states that “The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour,” i.e., for life barring impeachment for misconduct.

Democrats argue that term limits are necessary.

“Term limits are a necessary step toward restoring balance to this radical, unrestrained majority on the court,” said Mr. Johnson, who is chairman of the Judiciary subcommittee on courts, according to The Washington Times.

The Axios report said the bill would keep the number of voting justices at nine by moving an existing justice, the longest serving first, to senior status upon each biennial appointment.

 

 

//
//]]>

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post