//
-->//]]>

Judge dismisses Amber Head’s Jury Fraud Claims

 

A jury had ruled that Amber Heard (pictured) defamed Depp in June which prompted Heard and her legal team to seek a retrial, citing several reasons on grounds that an alleged fraud was committed by juror 15 who was accused of taking the summons from his father who goes by the same name.
Photo Credit: AP.

A judge Wednesday dismissed jury fraud claims by Amber Head alleging that one of the jurors in the defamation case between her and ex-husband Johnny Depp had committed fraud.

A jury had ruled that Heard defamed Depp in June which prompted Heard and her legal team to seek a retrial, citing several reasons on grounds that an alleged fraud was committed by juror 15 who was accused of taking the summons from his father who goes by the same name.

"Juror 15 had a birth year of 1945. Juror 15, however, was clearly born later than 1945. Publicly available information demonstrates that he appears to have been born in 1970," The filing submitted by Heard's lawyers said, according to Newsweek.

“Newly discovered facts” show Juror No. 15 in the six-week trial was not the individual summoned in April to serve in the case, Heard’s attorney wrote in a five-page memo filed in Virginia’s Fairfax Circuit Court, according to The Associated Press.

Judge Penney Azcarate ruled Wednesday that no fraud was committed because the summons did not include a birth date, a tweet by Angenette Levy of Law and Crime Network reads.

“Judge Penney Azcarate denies all of #AmberHeard's post-trial motions - including "Juror 15" claim,” Levy wrote.

Newsweek reported that Azcarate’s order which was obtained by USA Today said: "Juror Fifteen was vetted by the court on the record and met the statutory requirements for service. The parties also questioned the jury panel for a full day and informed the court that the jury panel was acceptable. Therefore, due process was guaranteed and provided to all parties in this litigation. There is no evidence of fraud or wrongdoing."

 Azcarate said under Virginia’s court rules, Heard’s legal team should have brought up the issue with the juror when the jury was first seated.

The order by Azcarate also dismissed Heard’s claim that the $10 million compensatory damage award to Depp was “excessive,” according to Newsweek.

"While Ms. Heard slings an exceptional amount of mud at the wall in the hope that something might stick, the jury's verdict on damages was perfectly reasonable and supported by the evidence and testimony in this case," Depp's team said.

Amber Head yet to pay $10 million in compensatory damages

Newsweek reported that the actress still owes Depp $8.5 million in damages after they were both found liable for defamation in their lawsuits against each other.

How it all began

Deep sued his ex-wife over a December 2018 op-ed Heard wrote in The Washington Post describing herself as “a public figure representing domestic abuse”.

The testimony focused mostly on whether Heard had been physically and sexually abused as she had claimed. Deep accused his ex-wife of being the abuser, adding that he never hit her.

The jury ruled in Deep’s favor on all three of his claims relating to specific statements in the 2018 article.

The jury decided Deep should receive $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages but the judge reduced the punitive damages award to $359, 000 under a state cap, The Associated Press reported.

//
//]]>

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post