//
-->//]]>

Justice Clarence Thomas crossed a line in conflict of interest: Adam Schiff

 

Adam Schiff said for Clarence Thomas to issue a decision, in a case of dissent, in a case where Congress is trying to get documents, and those documents might involve his own wife, that's the line that's been crossed.
Photo Credit: AP.

A member of the House Select Committee investigating January 6 insurrection at Congress has accused Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of crossing a line in a possible case of conflict involving his wife.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), referred to the Supreme Court ruling in January to reject a request by former President Donald Trump to prevent the release of White House records to the January 6 committee, where Thomas was the only justice to dissent, Washington Examiner reports.

"There are lines that shouldn't be crossed, but those lines involve sitting Supreme Court justices not presiding or appearing or taking action in cases in which their spouse may be implicated," Schiff said on CBS News, according to Washington Examiner. "And in this case, for Clarence Thomas to issue a decision, in a case of dissent, in a case where Congress is trying to get documents, and those documents might involve his own wife, that's the line that's been crossed. And I think, for Congress to be looking into these issues, looking into conflict of interest issues."

"But here, looking into issues whether it involves the wife of a Supreme Court justice or anyone else, if they have information or role in an effort to overturn an election. Yes, they're not excluded from examination."

Washington Examiner reported that Schiff was responding to a question from Face the Nation moderator Margaret Brennan, who asked the congressman if there are lines that shouldn’t be crossed here when it comes to the Supreme Court, noting, "One of the objections to the premise of a subpoena here is that it sets a dangerous precedent by putting the spouse of a justice in this political forum."

The Vice Chair of the January 6 panel Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) said Sunday that the committee was contemplating issuing subpoena to Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence over her contact with some of Trump’s officials during the former President’s bid to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

When Brennan asked if Schiff supported issuing a subpoena to Ginni Thomas, he responded saying

"If she has relevant information or investigation, we hope she comes in voluntarily," Schiff replied, echoing Cheney's position, according to Washington Examiner. "But if she doesn't, then we should give that a serious consideration. And, yes, I think those that we decided have important enough information should be subpoenaed."

January 6 contemplating subpoena

Cheney said the committee is “fully willing to contemplate a subpoena” for Ms. Ginni Thomas over her contact with Trump allies but hoped she agrees to testify voluntarily.

"The committee is engaged with her counsel. We hope she’ll agree to come in voluntarily. The committee is fully prepared to contemplate a subpoena if she does not," Cheney told CNN's Jake Tapper on Sunday. "I hope it doesn’t get to that."

Ginni Thomas texted with Trump officials to overturn Joe Biden's win

Thomas texted with then White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the aftermath of the presidential election, in coordinated efforts to overturn the 2020 results and deny Joe Biden victory.

The Washington Post had reported that she urged 29 GOP state lawmakers in Arizona to choose new presidential electors in failed efforts to reverse President Joe Biden’s win in the state.

//
//]]>

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post