//
-->//]]>

Appeals court asks Justice Department to resume probe of seized Mar-a-Lago records

 

An appeals court Wednesday asked U.S. Department of Justice to resume its probe of seized Mar-Lago documents as part of its continuing investigation into possible violations of federal laws as its relates to the mishandling, removal and storage of classified documents.  A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in favor of the Justice Department after it appealed an earlier ruling by a lower court. The DOJ may consider bringing criminal charges against former President Donald Trump for his role in the removal of “top secret” documents and other classified records from the White House.
Photo Credit: AP.

An appeals court Wednesday asked U.S. Department of Justice to resume its probe of seized Mar-Lago documents as part of its continuing investigation into possible violations of federal laws as its relates to the mishandling, removal and storage of classified documents.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in favor of the Justice Department after it appealed an earlier ruling by a lower court. The DOJ may consider bringing criminal charges against former President Donald Trump for his role in the removal of “top secret” documents and other classified records from the White House.

The appeals court said Trump had not presented any evidence he had declassified the records seized from his Palm Beach Florida home on August 8.

The Department of Justice said its investigation had been halted following an order from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon that temporarily prevented investigators from continuing use of the documents in its probe, according to The Washington Times. Three judges Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher – both nominated to the 11th Circuit by Trump and Robin Rosenbaum – nominated by former President Barack Obama agreed with the Justice Department, according to The Washington Times.

“It is self-evident that the public has a strong interest in ensuring that the storage of the classified records did not result in `exceptionally grave damage to the national security,”’ the judges wrote, The Washington Times reported. “Ascertaining that,” they added, “necessarily involves reviewing the documents, determining who had access to them and when, and deciding which (if any) sources or methods are compromised.”

The judges noted that an injunction that delayed or prevented the criminal investigation “from using classified materials risks imposing real and significant harm on the United States and the public,” according to The Washington Times.

How many documents did the FBI seized from Trump's Mar-a-Lago?

In August FBI agents seized about 11,000 documents including about 100 with classification markings during its search on the former president’s property after less intrusive methods of recovering the documents failed. Mr. Trump said he had declassified the documents without providing any evidence.

 

//
//]]>

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post